How We Eliminated Machining Fluid Foaming Issues and Increased Tool Life by 30%: A Practical Case Study from Production

Photo: aluminum Zheng ji / Unsplash

In metalworking operations, we often encounter issues that may seem minor at first glance but can significantly reduce production efficiency. One such problem is excessive foaming of metalworking fluids. Foam not only impairs visibility in the work zone but, more importantly, limits the cooling and lubrication of tools, leading to faster wear and poorer quality of the machined surface. In this article, we examine a specific case where we helped a customer identify the cause of foaming and proposed a solution that extended tool life by a third while reducing fluid consumption.

Excessive foaming issue: How it disrupted daily operations

In metalworking, the stability of machining fluids is crucial for both efficiency and production quality. In our case, however, excessive foaming of the cooling emulsion began to occur on one of the CNC lines, disrupting the entire process. The foam formed after just a few hours of operation, impairing visibility of the machining area and reducing cooling efficiency. Operators had to refill the fluid and clean the filters more frequently, leading to unplanned downtime and increased material consumption.

Analysis revealed that the cause was a combination of several factors: high water hardness in the facility, improper dosing of the concentrate, and contamination of the fluids with residual lubricants from previous operations. The foam also worsened chip removal, leading to their accumulation in the workspace and increased tool wear. The lifespan of milling cutters and drills decreased by approximately 20–25%, which also affected the surface quality of the workpieces. It was clear that without intervention, the situation would continue to deteriorate.

Diagnosis and Selection of the Right Solution: From Laboratory Tests to Practice

The first step was detailed laboratory testing of machining fluid samples. Using standard test methods, we measured pH, emulsion concentration, mineral content, and the presence of foreign substances. The results confirmed that water hardness (primarily high calcium and magnesium content) destabilized the emulsion and promoted foam formation. We also found that the concentrate used contained surfactants with low resistance to hard water, further exacerbating the problem.

Based on the analysis, we selected a combination of three measures: water treatment with softening agents, replacement of the concentrate with a variant containing modified surfactants, and optimization of dosing. The new concentrate was chosen to include surfactants with higher tolerance to hard water and, at the same time, better ability to disperse impurities. An important step was also the introduction of regular monitoring of water and emulsion quality to prevent similar issues in the future.

Photo: Sven Daniel / Unsplash

Implementation of changes: How we proceeded step by step

The implementation of the new system began with a thorough cleaning of the entire machining line, including tanks, pipelines, and filters. The old fluid was disposed of in accordance with REACH regulations and replaced with a fresh mixture using treated water. The new concentrate was dosed according to a precise ratio, which we verified under laboratory conditions. The operation was started gradually to monitor the system's response to the changes.

During the first two weeks, we checked the foaming level, pH, and emulsion concentration daily. Operators were trained to report any deviations, such as changes in fluid color or odor. After a month of operation, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation: foam formation was minimal, cooling efficiency improved, and fluid consumption decreased by 15%. The most significant result, however, was the reduction in tool wear, which extended tool life by 30%.

Results and Long-Term Benefits: What We Achieved and How to Prevent Issues

The implemented measures brought not only immediate improvements but also long-term savings. The reduction in tool and machining fluid consumption led to a decrease in operating costs by approximately 20%. The surface quality of workpieces improved, reducing the need for additional finishing. Thanks to a more stable emulsion, the frequency of machine maintenance also decreased, freeing up capacity for other production tasks.

Experience from this case shows how important it is to regularly monitor the quality of metalworking fluids and adjust their composition to specific operating conditions. We recommend implementing a system of regular checks, including testing water hardness, pH, and emulsion concentration. When selecting a concentrate, it is crucial to consider not only its technical parameters but also its compatibility with local conditions. Investing in high-quality raw materials and preventive maintenance always pays off – as our case demonstrates, even seemingly minor changes can lead to significant savings and increase production reliability.

Photo: Le Trung / Unsplash

Chemical causes of foaming and their impact on machining processes

Excessive foaming of machining fluids often stems from the chemical composition of the emulsion itself. Surfactants, which ensure wetting and emulsification of the oil phase, can cause stable foam when incorrectly dosed or combined with other additives. This foam then hinders effective cooling and lubrication of the tool, leading to faster wear. Another factor is the presence of contaminants such as residues of cleaning agents, metal chips, or microorganisms, which alter the surface tension of the fluid and promote bubble formation.

In our case, we found that the key issue was incompatibility between the base oil and the additives used. Certain types of polyols and esters, which improve lubricating properties, can release gases at the high temperatures generated during machining, stabilizing the foam. Laboratory analyses showed that the emulsion contained an excessively high concentration of anionic surfactants, which, while improving wetting, also increase the risk of foaming. The solution was to switch to a more balanced mixture of nonionic and anionic surfactants with lower foaming potential.

Optimizing Concentration and Maintenance of Machining Fluid

The correct concentration of machining fluid is crucial not only for tool performance but also for minimizing foaming. An excessively high concentration increases viscosity and promotes the formation of stable foam, while too low a concentration leads to insufficient lubrication and cooling. In our operation, we determined that the optimal range for the given type of machining lies between 5 and 7% emulsion in water. Regular measurement with a refractometer and replenishing the concentrate as needed ensured consistent performance without excessive foaming.

Maintenance of machining fluid also includes monitoring pH and water hardness. Water with a high mineral content (hard water) can cause surfactant precipitation and deposit formation, which disrupts emulsion stability. Conversely, overly soft water increases the risk of foaming. In our case, we implemented a water demineralization system and regular pH testing, which we maintain within the range of 8.5 to 9.5. An important step was also the introduction of metal chip filtration and regular removal of microbial contamination using biocides approved under the REACH regulation.

Selection of Additives to Reduce Foaming and Improve Emulsion Stability

The foaming issue can also be effectively addressed by adding specialized additives that destabilize bubbles and improve heat dissipation. In our case, we tested several types of defoamers, with silicone and polyether-based products achieving the best results. These substances reduce surface tension at the liquid-air interface, thereby accelerating bubble collapse. However, it is important to adhere to the recommended dosage – excessive defoamer concentration can lead to emulsion separation or deterioration of lubricating properties.

In addition to defoamers, we introduced additives to improve emulsion stability, such as corrosion inhibitors and chelating agents. These prevent the precipitation of metal ions and maintain emulsion homogeneity even at high temperatures. The result was not only reduced foaming but also a 40% extension of the fluid’s service life, leading to cost savings on replacement and disposal. When selecting additives, it is crucial to verify their compatibility with other emulsion components and follow the manufacturer’s instructions for safe use in accordance with CLP/GHS regulations.

Need a Custom Solution?

Every metalworking fluid requires an individual approach – from selecting the right type to optimizing maintenance. GCG Group provides detailed technical data sheets and safety data sheets (SDS) for every supplied raw material and offers guidance on selection and application based on specific operating conditions. Contact us – or browse our catalog of over 1,300 products.