How We Solved the Problem of Insufficient Adhesive Bonding on Polyolefin Surfaces: A Practical Case from the Automotive Industry

Photo: Patrick Hendry / Unsplash

In the automotive industry, polyolefins (e.g., polypropylene or polyethylene) are among the most commonly used plastics due to their low weight, durability, and cost-effectiveness. However, their surface energy is extremely low, which causes issues with the adhesion of adhesive and sealing systems. In one of our projects, a customer faced repeated failures of bonded joints on components made of modified polypropylene (PP-TD20). While the adhesive held immediately after application, delamination occurred after temperature cycling and humidity tests. We found the solution in a combination of chemical surface pretreatment and adjustment of the adhesive formulation – without the need for investments in plasma equipment or other costly technologies.

Problem: Insufficient adhesive adhesion on polyolefin components in automotive manufacturing

In the automotive industry, polyolefins (particularly polypropylene and polyethylene) are among the most commonly used plastics due to their low weight, chemical resistance, and cost-effectiveness. However, their surface energy is extremely low – typically below 30 mN/m – which means that conventional adhesives do not adhere sufficiently to them. In our case, this involved the assembly bonding of plastic dashboard covers, where the adhesion of a two-component polyurethane adhesive failed. After 24 hours of curing, the bonded joint detached under mechanical stress, even though technological parameters (temperature, humidity, pressure) were observed.

Analysis showed that the cause was not the quality of the adhesive, but insufficient surface pretreatment. Polyolefins are non-polar materials that repel water and most organic solvents. Without surface activation, neither chemical nor mechanical interaction with the adhesive occurs. Standard methods such as degreasing with acetone or isopropanol did not resolve the issue – surface energy remained below the critical threshold of 38 mN/m, which most adhesive systems require for reliable adhesion.

Diagnostics: Measuring Surface Energy and Identifying Critical Factors

To quantify the problem, we used the contact angle measurement method with test liquids (water, diiodomethane). The results confirmed that the surface energy of the polyolefin parts reached only 28–32 mN/m, which is significantly below the required value. For comparison – metals or glass have surface energy in the range of 500–1000 mN/m, while common plastics such as ABS or polycarbonate have around 40–45 mN/m. Low energy means that the adhesive does not have sufficient "adhesion" to the surface, and the cured joint can easily fail.

We also verified the influence of other factors: ambient temperature (20–25 °C), humidity (40–60 % RH), and open time of the adhesive (10–15 minutes) were within the recommended limits. Tests on samples with varying surface roughness (Ra 0.2–1.5 μm) showed that even mechanical treatment (sandblasting, grinding) did not lead to a permanent improvement in adhesion. The key finding was that without chemical or physical activation of the surface, reliable bonding of polyolefins cannot be achieved.

Photo: Ricardo Gomez Angel / Unsplash

Solution: Combination of Plasma Treatment and Special Primer

Based on diagnostics, we designed a two-stage pretreatment process. The first step was plasma activation of the surface using atmospheric plasma. This method uses ionized gas (typically air or nitrogen) for chemical modification of the polyolefin surface layer. Within seconds, oxidation occurs and polar functional groups (carboxyl, hydroxyl) form, increasing surface energy to 45–55 mN/m. The advantage of plasma treatment is its speed, waste-free nature, and the possibility of integration into the production line.

The second step involved applying a special chlorinated polyolefin (CPO)-based primer. This primer creates an intermediate layer between the activated surface and the adhesive, ensuring long-term bond stability. The primer was applied with a brush or spray in a thin layer (5–10 μm) and allowed to dry for 5–10 minutes. The combination of plasma treatment and primer led to a permanent increase in adhesion – peel tests (according to standard methods) showed a more than 300% increase in bond strength compared to the original state.

Implementation in Production and Long-Term Results

We implemented the process into serial production with minimal adjustments to the existing line. The plasma generator was installed as a separate station before bonding, with parameters (power, part feed speed) optimized to achieve consistent surface energy. The primer was applied manually, but automated spraying equipment can be used for higher production volumes. An important step was operator training and the introduction of regular surface energy checks using test pens (e.g., Dyne test inks).

After six months of operation, we evaluated the reliability of the solution: the rate of complaints related to insufficient adhesion dropped to zero. Long-term durability tests (temperature cycles, humidity, mechanical stress) confirmed that the bonds meet the requirements of the automotive industry (e.g., VW TL 520 17 or GMW15615 standards). The solution proved to be economically efficient – pretreatment costs were in the range of a few crowns per part, which is significantly less than alternative methods such as laser ablation or corona treatment.

Photo: American Public Power Association / Unsplash

Selecting the Right Adhesive: The Key Role of Chemical Compatibility

Polyolefins, such as polypropylene (PP) or polyethylene (PE), are among the least adhesion-friendly materials due to their low surface energy and non-polar structure. Standard adhesives based on epoxies, polyurethanes, or acrylates often fail on them because they cannot form sufficiently strong intermolecular bonds. In our case, we first mapped the available bonding technologies and focused on systems with chemical affinity for polyolefins.

The solution proved to be adhesives modified with special adhesion promoters, such as chlorinated polyolefins (CPO) or functional acrylates. These substances contain polar groups that interact with the polyolefin surface while also having compatible chains that bond to the adhesive matrix. It was important to verify whether the adhesive, after curing, achieves the required shear strength (minimum 5 MPa) and resistance to temperature cycles (-40 °C to +80 °C), which are typical requirements in the automotive industry. Tests on test samples confirmed that the combination of the right adhesive with surface treatment significantly improves adhesion, but it is not sufficient on its own—the critical factor remains surface activation.

Process Optimization: Plasma Treatment Parameters and Their Impact on Adhesion

Plasma treatment is an effective method for increasing the surface energy of polyolefins, but its effectiveness strongly depends on the setting of process parameters. In our project, we tested various low-pressure plasma modes with oxygen or argon atmospheres. The key was to find a balance between treatment intensity and the risk of material degradation. Excessively high plasma power can lead to over-oxidation of the surface, which, while increasing polarity, simultaneously weakens the mechanical strength of the top layer of the polyolefin.

We determined the optimal parameters through contact angle wetting measurements and peel strength tests. We found that for polypropylene parts, the ideal exposure time is 10–15 seconds at a power of 50–100 W and a pressure of 0.2–0.5 mbar. After treatment, the surface energy increased from the original 30 mN/m to over 60 mN/m, enabling better wetting by adhesives and primers. It was also important to ensure uniform plasma coverage, especially for parts with complex geometries where shielding of certain areas may occur. For these cases, we designed a rotational system to ensure consistent exposure of all surfaces.

Quality Control and Validation of Results Under Real-World Conditions

After implementing the new process, it was essential to introduce a quality control system to verify the long-term reliability of bonded joints. The automotive industry commonly uses accelerated aging tests, such as exposure to humidity (85 % RH at 85 °C for 1000 hours) or thermal shocks. Our samples passed these tests without a significant drop in adhesive strength, confirming the effectiveness of the chosen solution.

An important part of validation was also monitoring process stability during serial production. We introduced regular measurements of the surface energy of treated parts using test inks and adhesion checks via peel tests on randomly selected samples. Data from the first six months of operation showed that deviations in adhesive strength did not exceed 10 % of the reference value, which is fully acceptable for this application. This approach not only ensured quality but also enabled a rapid response to any process deviations, such as when changing primer batches or fluctuations in plasma parameters.

Do you need to optimize adhesion in your production?

Every material and application requires an individual approach. GCG Group supplies not only a broad portfolio of additives for adhesives and sealants but also technical support, including problem analysis and solution design. For each raw material, we provide detailed technical data sheets and safety data sheets (SDS) in compliance with REACH and CLP. Contact us – or browse our catalog of over 1,300 products right away.