Flame Retardants and Fire Safety: How to Properly Assess Risks According to REACH and CLP

Photo: Bernd 📷 Dittrich / Unsplash

Flame retardants are an essential component of many industrial materials, from plastics to construction materials. However, their proper use requires not only technical knowledge but also a thorough understanding of legislative requirements. The REACH and CLP/GHS regulations set clear rules for the classification, labelling, and documentation of these substances, where errors in risk assessment can lead to serious safety incidents or sanctions. How can you correctly interpret safety data sheets and ensure compliance with regulations without compromising production efficiency?

Flame retardants in industry: Role and legislative framework

Flame retardants, often referred to as fire retardants, are chemical substances or mixtures that slow down or prevent the spread of flame in materials. Their use is crucial in industries where fire safety is a critical factor – from construction and electronics to the automotive sector. In industrial practice, we encounter both organic and inorganic flame retardants, which can act physically (e.g., cooling) or chemically (e.g., interrupting the combustion chain reaction). The selection of the appropriate type depends on the material, its application, and the desired level of protection.

The legislative framework for flame retardants in the European Union is primarily defined by the REACH and CLP regulations. REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) sets out obligations for the registration, evaluation, and potential restrictions or authorisation of substances, including those with flame retardant properties. CLP (Classification, Labelling and Packaging) then determines how these substances must be classified, labelled, and packaged based on their hazardous properties. For manufacturers and distributors, it is essential to monitor updates to these regulations, as some flame retardants may be included on the list of Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) and subject to stricter regulations.

Risk Assessment Under REACH: A Step-by-Step Guide

Risk assessment related to flame retardants is an essential part of complying with the REACH regulation. The process begins with the identification of hazardous properties of the substance, which may include toxicity, ecotoxicity, or specific risks associated with combustion (e.g., the release of toxic gases). These properties are evaluated based on available data, experimental studies, or expert estimates. It is also important to consider exposure scenarios, i.e., how and where humans or the environment may be exposed to the substance throughout its lifecycle – from production and use to disposal.

The next step is risk characterization, which involves comparing the exposure level with toxicity threshold values or other safety criteria. If the risk is assessed as unacceptable, measures to reduce exposure must be designed and implemented, such as engineering controls, protective equipment, or substitution with a less hazardous alternative. The results of the risk assessment must be documented in the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) and updated with any significant changes in the use of the substance or new scientific findings.

Photo: Evan Marvell / Unsplash

Classification and Labelling According to CLP: Practical Aspects for Manufacturers and Distributors

The CLP Regulation introduces a harmonised system for the classification and labelling of chemical substances and mixtures, based on the Globally Harmonised System (GHS). For flame retardants, this means they must be classified according to their physico-chemical properties, health and environmental hazards. For example, substances that can release toxic gases during combustion must be labelled with the appropriate hazard symbols and standard hazard statements (H-phrases) and safety instructions (P-phrases).

Manufacturers and distributors are obliged to ensure that all packaging containing flame retardants is provided with correct labelling that corresponds to the classification of the substance or mixture. This includes not only hazard symbols and statements but also supplier information, substance identification and first aid instructions. It is also important to regularly check whether there have been any changes in classification due to new scientific findings or updates to the CLP Regulation. Incorrect or incomplete labelling can lead to legal penalties and endanger user safety.

Safety Data Sheets (SDS) and their role in fire safety

The Safety Data Sheet (SDS) is a key document providing comprehensive information on the hazardous properties of chemical substances and mixtures, including flame retardants. The SDS must contain 16 mandatory sections covering everything from substance and supplier identification, hazard classification, composition, first aid measures, fire-fighting instructions to information on ecological and regulatory aspects. For fire safety, sections on stability and reactivity, fire-fighting measures and disposal instructions are particularly important.

In practice, the SDS must be easily accessible to all employees who come into contact with flame retardants, as well as to customers who use these substances. The document must be regularly updated, especially if there are changes in the classification of the substance, new scientific findings, or changes in legislation. For manufacturers and distributors, it is important to ensure that the SDS is not only complete and accurate but also understandable for end users who may not have specialized chemical knowledge. A properly prepared SDS thus contributes to minimizing risks and ensuring safe handling of flame retardants.

Photo: Valentin Lacoste / Unsplash

Selecting the Right Flame Retardant: Technical and Legislative Criteria

When selecting flame retardants, it is crucial to consider not only their effectiveness but also their compatibility with the material and legislative requirements. Technical parameters such as thermal stability, additive migration in the polymer, or impact on mechanical properties must be verified using standard test methods. For example, halogenated flame retardants, while highly effective, have limited use due to environmental and health risks—some are already banned or strictly regulated under the REACH regulation. In contrast, halogen-free alternatives, such as organophosphorus compounds or metal hydroxides, offer lower toxicity but often require higher dosages to achieve comparable fire resistance.

Legislative criteria primarily include meeting the requirements for classification and labelling under the CLP regulation. Flame retardants must be properly classified into the relevant hazard classes (e.g., "Flammable liquids," "Acute toxicity," or "Hazardous to the aquatic environment") and provided with appropriate pictograms and standard hazard statements (H-phrases) and safety instructions (P-phrases). It is also important to verify whether the additive is included on the list of substances of very high concern (SVHC) under REACH, which could lead to an authorization requirement or restrictions on its use.

Documentation and Communication in the Supply Chain: From Manufacturer to End User

Safety data sheets (SDS) play a central role in communicating the risks associated with flame retardants throughout the supply chain. Manufacturers and distributors must ensure that SDS contain up-to-date and accurate information on physico-chemical properties, CLP classification, safe handling measures, and fire-safety precautions. Special attention should be given to Section 2 (Hazard identification), where all relevant H-phrases must be clearly stated, and Section 5 (Firefighting measures), which specifies suitable extinguishing agents and procedures in case of fire.

In practice, errors in information transfer between individual links in the chain often occur, especially when flame retardants are mixed with other chemicals or used in complex formulations. Manufacturers of final products (e.g., plastic components or coatings) must demand complete and transparent documentation from their suppliers, including confirmation of compliance with REACH and CLP. In the case of international trade, it is also necessary to consider the specific requirements of target markets, such as American OSHA standards or Chinese GB regulations.

Practical Tools for Fire Risk Assessment: From Laboratory Tests to Real-World Scenarios

The assessment of fire risk associated with flame retardants begins in the laboratory, where standard methods are used to test flammability, flame spread rate, smoke generation, and the toxicity of combustion products. Among the most commonly used tests are the determination of the Limiting Oxygen Index (LOI), which indicates the minimum oxygen concentration required to sustain combustion, or tests according to standardized procedures for building materials and textiles. These tests provide quantitative data that are essential for classifying materials according to fire classes and for designing appropriate protective measures.

However, laboratory results must be supplemented by an analysis of real-world scenarios, such as fire simulations in specific environments (e.g., in an industrial hall or a means of transport). Advanced modeling methods are applied here, taking into account factors such as ventilation, temperature gradients, or interactions with other materials. For manufacturers and processors, it is crucial to link these findings with documentation requirements—for example, safety data sheets must clearly state what conditions may affect the material's behavior in a fire and what measures should be taken to minimize risk.

Need clarity on legislative requirements?

For every raw material, we provide detailed Safety Data Sheets (SDS) and technical documentation in compliance with REACH and CLP. Our experts will advise you on how to properly assess risks and choose the optimal solution for your application—without unnecessary complications. Contact us—or browse our catalog of over 1,300 products right away.